|
Auditor General Thomas H. McTavish, C.P.A. Auditor General |
|
|
|
| INTRODUCTION | This report contains the results of our performance audit of the Monroe County Community Mental Health Services Board, Department of Mental Health, for the period October 1, 1991 through September 30, 1994. |
|---|---|
| AUDIT PURPOSE | This performance audit was conducted as part of the constitutional responsibility of the Office of the Auditor General. Performance audits are conducted on a priority basis related to the potential for improving effectiveness and efficiency. |
| BACKGROUND | The Monroe County Community Mental Health Services Board, established in 1964,
operates under provisions of the Mental Health Code, being Sections 330.1001 - 330.2106
of the Michigan Compiled Laws (Act 258, P.A. 1974). The board is an agency of
county government and is not a State agency. However, the board is subject to oversight
by the Department of Mental Health. The board is located in Monroe. It operates and/or contracts for inpatient, outpatient, partial day, residential, case management, respite, prevention, crisis, and gerontology services for the mentally ill and developmentally disabled. For fiscal year 1992-93, the board expended approximately $14.8 million. The board's operations are generally funded by 90% State and 10% local funds. As of September 30, 1994, the board had 151 full-time employees and served approximately 2,000 clients through board-operated and contracted programs. |
| AUDIT OBJECTIVES, CONCLUSIONS, AND NOTEWORTHY ACCOMPLISHMENTS | Audit Objective: To assess the effectiveness and efficiency
of selected board programs related to delivery of services and administrative oversight.
Conclusion: The board was effective and efficient in its delivery and oversight of mental health services. However, we noted four reportable conditions related to vendor payment documentation, contract management, pharmaceutical purchasing, and goal attainment reporting (Findings 1 through 4). Noteworthy Accomplishment: The board received accreditation, effective January 31, 1992, from the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations for its substantial compliance with national health care standards. The board was the first community mental health board in the State to receive such accreditation for its group home operations. Audit Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the board's reimbursement system related to rate setting, billing, and collecting for mental health services. Conclusion: The board's reimbursement system related to rate setting was not effective, while its system related to billing and collecting for mental health services was generally effective. We noted that the board did not periodically update many of its rates, lacked documentation to support some of its rate calculation methodologies, and utilized rate calculation methodologies that did not result in accurate reimbursement rates (Finding 5). In addition, we noted seven reportable conditions related to the internal control structure over the board's billing system and billing errors and omissions (Findings 6 through 12). Audit Objective: To assess the board's compliance with contracts, laws, rules, policies, directives, and procedures governing community mental health services board operations. Conclusion: The board generally complied with contracts, laws, rules, policies, directives, and procedures. However, we noted that the board did not maintain documentation to support waiting list data reported to the Department of Mental Health (Finding 13). |
| AUDIT SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY | Our audit scope was to examine the program and other records of the Monroe County
Community Mental Health Services Board for the period October 1, 1991 through September
30, 1994. Our audit was conducted in accordance with Government Auditing Standards
issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and, accordingly, included
such tests of the records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary
in the circumstances. To accomplish our objectives, we reviewed applicable statutes, rules, policies, and procedures; interviewed board and contract agency staff; assessed the effectiveness of applicable areas of the internal control structure; reviewed applicable program, financial, and clinical records; reviewed board costs to provide mental health services; and reviewed the board's monitoring of its performance relative to established goals and objectives. |
| AGENCY RESPONSES | Our audit report includes 13 findings and 20 corresponding recommendations. The board's preliminary response indicated that the board agreed with all of our recommendations. |
|
|